01-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 327-22

In re: Valencia County Professional Firefighters Association, IAFF and Valencia County Board of Commissioners

02-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 120-22

In re: American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Local 3022, and Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority

03-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 325-22

In re: Sandoval County Professional Firefighters Association, and Sandoval County

04-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 311-22

In re: State Personnel Office And the NM Commission for the Blind and CWA Local 7076

05-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 316-22

In re: State Personnel Office And Early Childhood Education And Care Department and CWA Local 7076

06-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 321-22

In re: State Personnel Office And Public Education Department and CWA Local 7076

07-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 303-22

In re: International Union of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW), AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

08-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 304-22

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

09-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 304-22

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

10-PELRB-2023, PERLB 119-22 and 122-22
PELRB 123-22

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center; AND International Union of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW), AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

11-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 111-22

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

12-PELRB-2023

In re: 2023 open Meeting Notice

13-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 102-23

In re: American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 18, AFL-CIO and New Mexico Human Services Department

14-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 303-23

In re: New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officers and County of Santa Fe

15-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 301-23

In re: Los Lunas Firefighters Association, Local 4297 and Village of Los Lunas

16-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 328-22

In re: Anthony Police Officers Association and City of Anthony

17-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 301-23

In re: Los Lunas Firefighters Association, Local 4297 and Village of Los Lunas

18-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 302-23

In re: Sandoval County Professional Firefighters Association, IAFF Local 4563 and Sandoval County

19-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 320-22

In re: State Personnel Office And Office of African American Affairs and CWA Local 7076

20-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 322-22

In re: State Personnel Office And the NM State Treasurer’s Office and CWA Local 7076

21-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 323-22

In re: State Personnel Office And Miner’s Colfax Medical Center and CWA Local 7076

22-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 324-22

In re: State Personnel Office And NM Workers’ Compensation Administration and CWA Local 7076

23-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 317-22

In re: Communication Workers of America And State Personnel Office and NM General Services Department

24-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 318-22

In re: Communication Workers of America And State Personnel Office and NM Human Services Department-Behavioral Health Services

25-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 305-23

In re: Sandoval County Sheriff Deputies Association And NM Coalition of Public Safety Officers Association

26-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 304-22

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO And University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

27-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 315-22

In re: State Personnel Office and NM Department of Information Technology And Communication Workers of America

28-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 109-23

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO And University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

29-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 110-23

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO And University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

30-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 111-23

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO And University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

31-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 312-22

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Dept of Cultural AFFAIRS) And Communication Workers of America

32-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 308-23

In re: District 1199NM, National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees And University of New Mexico Hospitals

33-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 310-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Dept of Homeland Security and Emergency Management) And American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 18

34-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 311-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Division of Vocational Rehabilitation) And American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 18

35-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 312-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Early Childhood Education and Care Department) And American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 18

36-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 313-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: New Mexico Department of Transportation) And American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 18

37-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 314-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Office of the Superintendent of Insurance) And American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 18

38-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 315-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Public Regulation Commission) And American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 18

39-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 316-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Regulation Licensing Department) And American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 18

40-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 109-23

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

41-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 110-23

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

42-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 111-23

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

43-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 313-22

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Department of Health) And Communication Workers of America

44-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 314-22

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Department of Health-Sequoyah) And Communication Workers of America

45-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 319-22

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: NM Environment Department) And Communication Workers of America

46-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 317-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: NM Taxation and Revenue Department) And AFSCME Council 18

47-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 318-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Department of Cultral Affairs) And AFSCME Council 18

48-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 326-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Aging and Long Term Services Department) And AFSCME Council 18

49-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 330-23

In re: District 1199NM, National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees And University of New Mexico Hospitals

50-PELRB-2023, PELRB CASE NO. 329-23

In re: Kelli McKee And American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 18

51-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 309-23

In re: AFSCME Council 18 And Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District

52-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 319-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Department of Workforce Solutions) And AFSCME Council 18

53-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 320-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Human Services Department) And AFSCME Council 18

54-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 321-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Expo NM) And AFSCME Council 18

55-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 322-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Department of Health – NM Behavioral Health Institute) And AFSCME Council 18

56-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 323-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Department of Health – Fort Bayard Medical Center) And AFSCME Council 18

57-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 324-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Department of Health – Los Lunas Community Program) And AFSCME Council 18

58-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 325-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: Department of Health – NM Behavioral Health Institute) And AFSCME Council 18

59-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 304-22

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

60-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 105-23

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

61-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 108-23

In re: International Association Of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

62-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 119-23

In re: Utility Workers Union Of America and Village Of Bosque Farms

63-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 116-22

In re: AFSCME, Council 18 and State Of New Mexico, New Mexico Corrections Department

64-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 337-23

In re: State Personnel Office (In re: NM Corrections Dep’t – Adult Prisons Division) and AFSCME, Council 18

65-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 338-23

In re: NM Corrections Dep’t – Probation and Parole Division and AFSCME, Council 18

66-PELRB-2023, PELRB Case No. 334-23

In re: District 1199NM, National Union Of Hospital and Health Care Employees and University Of New Mexico Hospitals

67-PELRB-2023, PELRB Case No. 336-23

In re: District 1199NM, National Union Of Hospital and Health Care Employees and University Of New Mexico Hospitals

68-PELRB-2023, PELRB No. 332-23

In re: Professional Fire Fighters Of Torrance County, IAFF Local 5441 and Torrance County

01-PELRB-2022, PELRB NO. 127-21

In re: American Federation of Teachers and International Association of Machinists and Areospace Workers, AFL-CIO and UNM Sandoval Regional Medical Center, Inc.

02-PELRB-2022, PELRB NO. 306-21

In re: United Health Profiessionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and UNM Sandoval Regional Medical Center, Inc.

03-PELRB-2022, PELRB NO. 309-21

In re: United Health Profiessionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and UNM Sandoval Regional Medical Center, Inc.

04-PELRB-2022, PELRB NO. 307-20

In re: United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America and University of New Mexico

05-PELRB-2022, PELRB NO. 311-21

In re: Classifed School Employees Council-Las Cruces and Las Cruces Public Schools

06-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 307-20

In re: United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America (UE) and University of New Mexico, Board of Regents

07-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 317-21

In re: Penasco Federation of United School Employees, AFT-NM Local 4285 and Penasco Independent Schoool District

08-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 315-21

In re: Amanda Macias and New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officers

09-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 314-21

In re: Tierra Encantada Charter School-NEA and Tierra Encantada Charter School

10-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 301-22

In re: Victoria Gurule and American Federation of State, County And Municipal Employees, Council 18

11-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 302-22

In re: Alma Linan Rodriguez and Tierra Encantada Charter School-NEA

12-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 313-21

In re: United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America and New Mexico State University Board of Regents

NMSU objected to a Card Check  conducted on March 17, 2022 pursuant to Section 10-7E-14(C) of the PEBA. NMSU’s objections are summarized as follows: (1) the Board did not adopt rules governing the administration of card check proceedings before conducting the card check related to the Petition; (2) the Board did not use an updated bargaining unit list for the card check proceedings; (3) the misspelled printed names on the challenged authorization cards raised concerns about fraud in the card check proceedings; (4) the Card Check Agreement was violated because (a) an administrative assistant conducted the card count along with the Executive Director and (b) the Union had two observers physically present during the card count; (5) the authorization cards were not “sufficiently current” under the Board’s rules; and (6) the Board’s form used to record the results of the card check is misleading because it is titled “Results of Card Check in Lieu of Election” and states that the “above [tally] is a true statement of the election returns” (emphasis added). 

After reviewing the Director’s Report on Objections to Card Check issued on April 18, 2022, the Results of the Card Check, and the pleadings in this matter, hearing oral argument from the parties, and being otherwise sufficiently advised, the Board concluded: 

a. The Board has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter in these proceedings.

b. Section 10-7E-14(C) of PEBA provides: “As an alternative to the provisions of Subsection A of this section, a labor organization with a reasonable basis for claiming to represent a majority of the employees in an appropriate bargaining unit may submit authorization cards from a majority of the employees in an appropriate bargaining unit to the board or local board, which shall, upon verification that a majority of the employees in the appropriate bargaining unit have signed valid authorization cards, certify the labor organization as the exclusive representative of all public employees in the appropriate bargaining unit. The employer may challenge the verification of the board or local board; the board or local board shall hold a fact-finding hearing on the challenge to confirm that a majority of the employees in the appropriate bargaining unit have signed valid authorization cards.” 

c. The March 17, 2022 card check was conducted under and in accordance with Section 10-7E-14(C). 

d. As the Board previously decided in In re: United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America and University of New Mexico (“UE v. UNM”), PELRB No. 307-20 (Jan. 27, 2022), 4-PELRB-2022, the Board’s statutory obligation to hold a fact-finding hearing on an employer’s challenge to the Board’s verification under Section 10-7E-14(C) is self-executing and does not require or depend on the adoption of procedural rules. For the same reasons discussed in that decision, the lack of rules for the conduct of a card check did not render the card check related to the Union’s Petition invalid. 

e. The Board also decided in UE v. UNM that PEBA does not require the Board to use an updated bargaining unit list when conducting a card check proceeding. Section 10-7E-14(C) allows labor organization to submit authorization cards from a majority of employees in the proposed bargaining unit with its representation petition. The Board then verifies “that a majority of the employees in the bargaining unit have signed valid authorization cards,” and, if so, certifies the labor organization as the exclusive representative. The Board’s verification is based on the authorization cards submitted with the petition, which means the Board necessarily relies on the list of employees in the bargaining unit at the time the petition is filed. As stated in the Board’s decision in UE v. UNM, “the purpose of a card check is to test majority support as of the time a petition is submitted” (quoting from the Director’s Report in UE v. NMSU on objections to the card check). 

f. The misspelled printed names on the authorization cards do not, by themselves, indicate fraud. The cards were challenged based on the misspellings and properly removed from the count. No showing was made that the challenged cards affected the validity of the remaining cards included in the count. 

g. NMSU’s objections related to alleged violations of the Card Check Agreement are without merit. The Agreement did not preclude the Executive Director from having a staff member under his supervision assist in conducting the card check. The Agreement’s provisions governing observers is based on the Board’s rules for observers during ballot counts, which specify that “observers shall not be … labor organization employees” and allow “representatives of the parties in addition to the observers to observe the counting of ballots.” 11.21.2.29 NMAC. Under these rules, the Union had only one eligible observer, Mr. Montalbano, who was physically present at the card check and signed the card check results. NMSU did not show what effect, if any, the alleged violations of the Card Check Agreement had on the validity of the authorization cards or the card check process. 

h. NMSU’s objection related to whether the authorization cards are “sufficiently current” is premised on the submission of the cards ten months before the card check was conducted. However, as with the list of eligible employees discussed above, the time for determining whether an authorization card is “sufficiently current” is when the representation petition is filed, not at the time of the card check proceedings. See 11.21.2.13(A) NMAC (requiring the Director to investigate the petition within 30 days of filing, including whether the signatures on the showing of interest (in the form of cards or a petition) “are sufficiently current”). NMSU does not claim that the authorization cards were insufficiently current when the Union submitted the Petition to the NMSU Labor Management Relations Board. Because the cards presumably were “sufficiently current” when the NMSU Labor Management Relations Board reviewed the Petition, there are no grounds for the objection. 

i. NMSU’s contention that the title of the Board’s form used to record the results of the card check and references in the form to “election returns” are misleading has no merit. No evidence was presented that parties and other persons participating in the card check were confused or misled by the challenged language on the form or that it affected the validity of the authorization cards or card check proceedings. 

j. A majority of the employees in the appropriate bargaining unit have signed valid authorization cards, as evidenced by the Results of the Card Check in Lieu of Election dated March 17, 2022.

The Board, therefore, dismissed  NMSU’s objections to the results of the March 17, 2022 card check and directed its staff to issue a Certification of Exclusive Representation. 

13-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 133-21

In re: N. M. Coalition of Public Safety Officers and Santa Fe County Deputy Sheriff’s Ass’n v. Santa Fe County

14-PELRB-2022, PELRB 305-22

In re: Penasco Federation of United School Employees, AFT – NM Local 4285 and Penasco Independent School District

15-PELRB-2022, PELRB 306-22

In re: Santa Fe County Firefighters Association and Santa fe County

16-PELRB-2022, PELRB 303-22

In re: International Associate of Machinists & Areospace Workers and UNM Sandoval Regional Medical Center

17-PELRB-2022, PELRB 309-22

In re: Rio Rancho School Employees Union and Rio Rancho Public School District

18-PELRB-2022, PELRB 106-22

In re: AFSCME, Local 3022 and Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority

19-PELRB-2022, PELRB 310-22

In re: United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America and New Mexico State University

20-PELRB-2022, PELRB 308-22

In re: District 1099NM, National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees and University of New Mexico Hospitals

21-PELRB-2022, PELRB 303-22

In re: International Union of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW), AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

22-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 307-22

In re: Town of Bernalillo Professional Firefighters Ass’n – IAFF and Town of Bernalillo

23-PELRB-2022

In re: Open Meeting Notice Resolution

24-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 303-22

In re: International Union of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW), AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

25-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 114-22

In re: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 18, AFL-CIO, Local 3022, and Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority

26-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 304-22

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

On December 1, 2022 this Board issued its Order 26-PELRB-2022, in which it adopted, its Hearing Officer’s recommended decision that House Supervisors and Charge Nurses are not excluded from coverage under the PEBA and are appropriate for inclusion in the bargaining unit, but reversed, that decision with respect to the Hearing Officer’s conclusion that “SRMC employees employed on a per diem or ‘PRN’ basis are not ‘regular’ employees” for the purposes of the PEBA. The Board remanded the case to the Hearing Officer for the purpose of determining whether the PRNs share a community of interest with others in the petitioned-for unit so that their inclusion in the unit would not render it inappropriate. See NMSA 1978 § 10-7E-13 (2020) re: Appropriate bargaining units.

On January 13, 2023 the Board’s Hearing Officer issued his Report and Recommended Decision Concerning Designation of An Appropriate Bargaining Unit, concluding that PRNs in the proposed unit shared a community of interest with others in the unit so that their inclusion would not render the unit inappropriate. The Executive Director then conducted a card check and determined that there was a sufficient showing of interest to establish majority support for United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT-AFL-CIO as the exclusive representative for collective bargaining. Therefore,  a Certification of Representation was issued on January 19, 2023. SRMC filed a Motion to Strike the card check results as premature and invalid, and requested to remove approval of the card check results from the Board’s February 7, 2023 agenda. The Board denied the request to remove the matter from its agenda, considered the Motion to Strike and rendered two Orders: 

a. 8-PELRB-2023, by which the Board affirmed found that the Executive Director resolved all questions concerning representation and his designation of the appropriate bargaining unit as including PRN or Per Diem positions was affirmed; and,

b. 9-PELRB-2023, by which, the Board denied UNM SRMC’ Motion to strike card check results as premature and invalid and its request to remove review of the card check results as without merit. Because there was no timely filed objection to the card check results pursuant to NMAC 11.21.2.34 and the Executive Director’s card check was not premature nor invalid, the PELRB ratified and affirmed the Executive Director’s Card Check Results Report issued January 19, 2023 and the Certification of Representation resulting from it.

As of this writing, the time for seeking Judicial review pursuant to SCRA 1-074, has not yet passed, so that the file remains open until appellate review is completed or waived. 

27-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 104-22

In re: McKinley County Federation of United School Employees Local 3313, AFT-NM and Gallup-McKinley County Public Schools

28-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 111-22

In re: United Health Professionals of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

29-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 112-22

In re: American Federation of Teachers and International Union of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW), AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

UNM SRMC appealed to the Board from the Hearing Officer’s Report and Recommended Decision dated September 28, 2022 concluding that that SRMC violated NMSA 1978 § 10-7E-5(A)(2020), which guarantees public employees’ rights to form, join or assist a labor organization for the purpose of collective bargaining through representatives chosen by them without interference, restraint or coercion; NMSA 1978 § 10-7E-5(B)(2020), which guarantees public employees’ rights to engage in concerted activities for mutual aid or benefit, and NMSA 1978 § 10-7E-14(A) requiring a public employer to provide the labor organization within ten business days the names, job titles, work locations, home addresses, personal email addresses and home or cellular telephone numbers of any public employee in the proposed bargaining unit. Inasmuch as NMSA 1978 § 10-7E-5(19)(G) (2020) makes it a prohibited practice to “refuse or fail to comply with a provision of the Public Employee Bargaining Act or board rule” the Hearing Officer further concluded that the UNM SRMC violated PEBA by declining to provide the Union with the list of bargaining unit employees in the proposed unit in PELRB Case No. 303-22, along with their contact information.

The Board adopted the Recommended Decision and findings therein and ordered Respondent to cease and desist from violating the PEBA as therein, acknowledge the violations found therein by posting notice to its employees of the violations in a manner by which its employees customarily receive notice from Respondent. 

30-PELRB-2022, PELRB No. 108-22

In re: American Federation of Teachers and International Union of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW), AFL-CIO and University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical Center

1-PELRB-2021, PELRB 301-20

In re: New Mexico Park Ranger’s Law Enforcement Association and New Mexico Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department

2-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 106-20

In re: AFSCME Council 18, Local 3999 v. City of Santa Fe

3-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 106-20

In re: AFSCME Council 18, Local 3999 v. City of Santa Fe

4-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 305-20

In re: AFSCME, Local 2851 and City of Las Vegas

5-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 108-20

In re: Penasco Federation of United School Employees v. Penasco Independent School District

• Union employees claimed the School District had committed prohibited practices violating §§ 10-7E-19(A), (B), (D) or (E) (2020), by discriminating against several of the School’s Union employees, some of whom were also Union Officers, after the Union members discussed the removal of the School’s Superintendent at a few public-school board meetings while wearing Union insignia. Shortly following these events the Union member’s contracts were not renewed for various School Board policy violations. Additionally, Union members had email correspondence circulated encouraging teachers to not participate in the District’s voluntary grant survey. The District’s Superintendent cited this action as insubordinate while the Union claimed it to be concerted activities, protected under Section 5 of PEBA. After reviewing the evidence and utilizing the Wright Line analysis, the Hearing Officer found in favor of some, but not all Union members whose contracts were not renewed. Upon appeal, the Court affirmed the Hearing Officer’s decision with exception to the concerted activities (due to the action having occurred prior to the 2020 PEBA amendments which added protection for concerted activities, overlooking the Board’s long history of protecting concerted activities prior to the 2020 amendment).

6-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 204-20

In re: City of Deming Labor Management Relations Board

7-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 205-20

In re: San Juan College Labor Management Relations Board

8-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 206-20

In re: Central New Mexico Community College Labor Management Relations Board

9-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 207-20

In re: Dona Ana County Labor Management Relations Board

10-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 208-20

In re: Alamogordo Public Schools Labor Management Relations Board

11-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 209-20

In re: Town of Silver City Labor Management Relations Board

12-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 210-20

In re: Sandoval County Labor Management Relations Board

13-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 211-20

In re: City of Roswell Labor Management Relations Board

14-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 212-20

In re: City of Hobbs Labor Management Relations Board

15-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 213-20

In re: Los Alamos County Labor Management Relations Board

16-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 214-20

In re: Albuquerque Public Schools Labor Management Relations Board

17-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 215-20

In re: Aztec Municipal Schools Labor Management Relations Board

18-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 216-20

In re: New Mexico State University Labor Management Relations Board

19-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 217-20

In re: City of Raton Labor Management Relations Board

20-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 218-20

In re: City of Las Cruces Labor Management Relations Board

21-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 219-20

In re: Zuni Public Schools Labor Management Relations Board

22-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 220-20

In re: City of Albuquerque Labor Management Relations Board

23-PELRB-2021, PELRB 122-20

In re: McKinley County Federation of United School Employees Local 2212, AFT-NM v. Gallup-McKinley County Public Schools

24-PELRB-2021

Open Meetings Notice Resolution, March 2021 – March 2022

25-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 213-20

In re: County of Los Alamos Labor Management Relations Board

26-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 201-21

In re: City of Gallup Labor-Management Relations Board

27-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 202-21

In re: Luna County Labor-Management Relations Board

28-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 203-21

In re: Chavez County Labor-Management Relations Board

29-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 206-20

In re: Central New Mexico Community College Labor-Management Relations Board

30-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 207-20

In re: Dona Ana County Labor-Management Relations Board

31-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 208-20

In re: Alamogordo Schools Labor Management Relations Board

32-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 209-20

In re: Town of Silver City Labor-Management Relations Board

33-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 211-20

In re: City of Roswell Labor-Management Relations Board

34-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 212-20

In re: City of Hobbs Labor-Management Relations Board

35-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 213-20

In re: Incorporated County of Los Alamos Labor Management Relations Board

36-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 215-20

In re: Aztec Municipal School District Labor-Management Relations Board

37-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 217-20

In re: City of Raton Labor-Management Relations Board

38-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 218-20

In re: City of Las Cruces Labor-Management Relations Board

39-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 219-20

In re: Zuni Public Schools Labor-Management Relations Board

40-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 220-20

In re: City of Albuquerque Labor-Management Relations Board

41-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 220-20

In re: City of Albuquerque Labor Management Relations Board

42-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 206-20

In re: Central New Mexico Community College Labor Management Relations Board

43-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 207-20

In re: Dona Ana County Labor Management Relations Board

44-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 208-20

In re: Alamogordo Public Schools Labor Management Relations Board

45-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 212-20

In re: City of Hobbs Labor Management Relations Board

46-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 214-20

In re: Albuquerque Public Schools Labor Management Relations Board

47-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 216-20

In re: New Mexico State University Labor Management Relations Board

48-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 219-20

In re: Zuni Public Schools Labor Management Relations Board

49-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 204-20

In re: City of Deming Labor Management Relations Board

50-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 209-20

In re: Town of Silver City Labor Management Relations Board

51-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 211-20

In re: City of Roswell Labor Management Relations Board

52-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 218-20

In re: City of Las Cruces Labor Management Relations Board

53-PELRB-2021, PELRB 102-21

In re: McKinley County Federation of United School Employees Local 2212, AFT-NM v. Gallup-McKinley County Public Schools

54-PELRB-2021, PELRB 121-20

In re: Bernalillo County Court Deputies Association v. Bernalillo County

• The Complainant filed a PPC alleging the Respondent breached a duty to bargain before changing shift hours and transferring bargaining unit work to non-bargaining unit employees. The opposing parties are in separate bargaining units, covered by separate CBAs, and represented by different unions. However, NMSA 1978, § 10-7E-6 allows the transfer of public employees unless limited by the provisions of the CBA. In this case, the CBA’s Management Rights Clause stated that management could transfer unit employees and change shift hours in order to maintain the governmental operations entrusted to it by law. In the absence of any explicit restriction within the CBA, the complaint was dismissed.

55-PELRB-2021, PELRB 122-20

In re: McKinley County Federation of United School Employees Local 2212, AFT-NM v. Gallup-McKinley County Public Schools

56-PELRB-2021, PELRB 119-20

In re: AFSCME Council 18 Local 3999 v. City of Santa Fe

57-PELRB-2021, PELRB 205-20

In re: San Juan College Labor Management Relations Board

58-PELRB-2021, PELRB 210-20

In re: Sandoval County Labor Management Relations Board

59-PELRB-2021, PELRB 220-20

In re: City of Albuquerque Labor Management Relations Board

60-PELRB-2021, PELRB 213-20

In re: Los Alamos County Labor Management Relations Board

61-PELRB-2021, PELRB 301-21

In re: Santa Fe County Firefighters Association, IAFF 4366, v. Santa Fe County

62-PELRB-2021, PELRB 302-21

In re: NEA-Turquoise Trail Charter School v. Turquoise Trail Charter School

63-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 305-21

In re: Taos Professional Firefighters Association v. Town of Taos

64-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 302-21

In re: NEA-Turquoise Trail Charter School v. Turquoise Trail Charter School

65-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 101-21

In re: American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Exployees, New Mexico Council 18, AFL-CIO v. Board of County Commissioners for Bernalillo County

On March 24, 2021 the Hearing Officer issued his letter decision denying summary judgment as to claims of retaliation but recognizing the parties’ resolution of the union’s allegation in paragraph 13 of the Second Amended PPC that the County violated the terms of a Memorandum of Understanding regarding hazard pay, and summarily dismissing the alleged violation of Section 19(H).

A hearing on the merits was held on April 21 and 22, 2021 and on June 8, 2021 The Board’s Hearing Officer concluded that the County committed a prohibited labor practice pursuant to NMSA 1978 Section 10-7E-19(F) (2020) by failing or refusing to bargain elimination of Boundary Spanners job positions without bargaining. The County committed a second violation of Sections 17(A)(1), and Section 19(F) by withholding information relevant to the layoff of Boundary Spanners. The County violated Sections 19(B), 19(D) and 19(E) of the Act by its investigations of two employee union organizers arising out of the HR Complaint by another employee. All other allegations of violations of Sections 19(A), 19(B), 19(D), 19(E) and 19(F) not sustained and were dismissed. The Hearing officer recommended that the Employer be ordered to (1) Cease and desist from all violations of the PEBA;

(2) Post and email notice of its violations of PEBA as found herein on a form acceptable to the parties and this Board with assurances that it will comply with the Public Employee Bargaining Act in the future;

(3) Bargain in good faith with the Union regarding the terms under which the laid off Boundary Spanners who have not already been, can be placed in the same or similar position with DBHS; and

(4) Bargain in good faith with the Union to reach agreement on an appropriate back-pay or damages award for the Boundary Spanners who have not already been or cannot now be placed in the same or similar position with DBHS.

The Board affirmed the Hearing Officer’s Decision and adopted his Recommended Decision after amending the remedies to include requiring the County remove any reference to the investigation at issue in the case from the personnel files of the two employees involved.

66-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 307-20

In re: United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE) v. University of New Mexico Board of Regents

67-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 302-21

In re: NEA-Turquoise Trail Charter School v. Turquoise Trail Charter School

68-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 107-21

In re: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 18, AFL-CIO, Local 3022 v. Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority

• A past practice will not be binding if there is insufficient evidence to establish it. Local 3022 “did not  establish that the Water Authority deviated from past practice” and “the testimony presented at the  hearing established that the Water Authority had a past practice of assigning new supervisors to a  shift rather than having them immediately participate in a shift bid.” The instant PPC is not based on  allegations the Employer violated a past practice but is entirely based on breach of the parties’ CBA  and failure to bargain, as stated in the Stipulated Pre-Hearing Order, wherein Complainant alleges  violations of § 17(A)(1) (requiring Respondent and AFSCME to “bargain in good faith on wages,  hours and all other terms and conditions of employment”); § 19(F) (making it a prohibited practice to  “refuse to bargain 13 collectively in good faith with the exclusive representative”); and § 19(H) (making it a prohibited practice to “refuse or fail to comply with a collective bargaining agreement”).  To the contrary it is ABCWUA that is asserting a past practice when it argues that the Water  Authority had a long history of assigning new supervisors to a shift of its choosing and that the Water  Authority had a past practice of not allowing employees to bid on all available shifts, and instead included “qualifiers” limiting the shifts that were available. 

69-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 108-21

In re: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 18, AFL-CIO, Local 3022 v. Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority

On July 27, 2021 the PELRB Executive Director issued his Report and Recommended decision concluding that the Water Authority did not refuse to bargain, as required by both Article 19 of the CBA and § 17 of the PEBA, as the Union’s PPC alleged, because it already bargained for such job descriptions to be performed and approved in management’s discretion and was not required to bargain the specific issue further, midterm. Therefore, it did not violate §§ 19(F) 19(H) of the PEBA by its actions in this case. As there is no argument that the Water Authority failed or refused to comply with the parties’ collective bargaining agreement in any other respect, the Executive Director Dismissed the Complaint.

The Board affirmed the Recommended Decision on October 18, 2021. See 69-PELRB-2021. Neither party sought further appeal and staff closed the file on December 10, 2021.   

70-PELRB-2021, PELRB No. 306-21

In re: United Health Professional of New Mexico, AFT, AFL-CIO v. University of New Mexico Sandoval Regional Medical

71-PELRB-2021, PELRB 106-20

In re: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 18, AFL-CIO, Local 3999 v. City of Santa Fe

72-PELRB-2021, PELRB 308-21

In re: AFSCME, Council 18 v. Luna County

73-PELRB-2021, PELRB 307-20

In re: United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America v. University of New Mexico

74-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 303-21

In re: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, New Mexico Council 18, AFL-CIO v. New Mexico Children, Youth, and Families Department

75-PELRB-2021, PELRB NO. 307-20

In re: United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America v. University of New Mexico

1-PELRB-2019, PELRB CASE NO. 113-18

AFSCME, Local 3277 & City of Rio Rancho

2-PELRB-2019, PELRB NO. 311-18

AFSCME, Local 3103 & San Miguel County

3-PELRB-2019, PELRB No. 310-18

AFSCME, Council 18 & Hidalgo County

4-PELRB-2019, PELRB CASE NO. 113-18

AFSCME, Local 3277 & City of Rio Rancho

5-PELRB-2019

Open Meetings Notice Resolution

6-PELRB-2019, PELRB CASE NOS. 125-15 and 127-15
(Consolidated)

AFSCME, Council 18 and CWA, Local 7076 v. State of New Mexico

7-PELRB-2019, PELRB CASE NO. 301-19

Communications Workers of America & Third Judicial District Attorney’s Office

8-PELRB-2019, PELRB 201-13

In re: Hidalgo County Labor Management Relations Board

9-PELRB-2019, PELRB CASE NO. 302-19

NEA-Las Vegas City Schools & Las Vegas City Schools

10-PELRB-2019, PELRB Case No. 115-18

Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC & State of New Mexico

11-PELRB-2019, PELRB Case No. 117-18

Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO & New Mexico Department of Health

12-PELRB-2019, PELRB Case Nos. 122-14 and 127-15

Communications Workers of America, Local 7076 & State of New Mexico

13-PELRB-2019, PELRB CASE NO. 302-19

NEA-Las Vegas City & Las Vegas City Schools

14-PELRB-2019, PELRB CASE NO. 102-19

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Counsel 18, AFL-CIO & State of New Mexico, New Mexico Corrections Department

15-PELRB-2019, PELRB CASE NO. 114-18

AFSCME, Council 18 & State of New Mexico

16-PELRB-2019, PELRB CASE NO. 116-18

American Federation of State, County and Muncipal Employees, Council 18, AFL-CIO & State of New Mexico State Personnel Office and New Mexico Corrections Department

17-PELRB-2019, PELRB CASE NO. 125-15

AFSCME, Council 18 and CWA, Local 7076 & State of New Mexico

18-PELRB-2019, PELRB 202-19

In re: Loving Municipal Schools

19-PELRB-2019

In re: City of Portales, Ordinance 741

20-PELRB-2019, PELRB CASE NO. 103-19

Rhonda Goodenough & N.M. Children, Youth and Families Dep’t

21-PELRB-2019, PELRB 304-19

AFSCME, Council 18, Local 2911 & Taos County

22-PELRB-2019, PELRB 225-04

In re: City of Socorro

23-PELRB-2019, PELRB 202-05

In re: City of Tucumcari

24-PELRB-2019, PELRB 206-07

In re: Espanola Municipal School District

25-PELRB-2019, PELRB 202-07

In re: Carlsbad Municipal School District

1-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 107-15

AFSCME Council 18 v. The Board Of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County

2-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 305-15

AFSCME Council 18 and The Board Of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County

3-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 105-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Andrew Gilmore v. Luna County

4-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 105-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Andrew Gilmore v. Luna County

5-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 309-15

AFSCME Council 18 and New Mexico Human Services Department

6-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 128-15

AFSCME Council 18 and The Board Of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County

7-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 105-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Andrew Gilmore v. Luna County

8-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 105-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Andrew Gilmore v. Luna County

9-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 310-15

AFSCME Council 18 v. Luna County

10-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 105-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Andrew Gilmore v. Luna County

11-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 108-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Chris Verduzco v. Luna County

12-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 112-16

Luna County v. AFSCME Council 18

13-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 310-15

AFSCME Council 18 and Luna County

14-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 304-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Luna County Sheriff’s Department

15-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 119-16

Benjamin C. Wolfe v. Albuquerque Public Schools & Karen Rudys

16-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 124-15

AFSCME Council 18 v. City of Espanola

17-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 105-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Andrew Gilmore v. Luna County

18-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 306-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Rio Arriba County

19-PELRB-2016, PELRB 108-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Chris Verduzco v. Luna County

20-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 128-15

AFSCME Council 18 v. The Board Of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County

21-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 309-15

AFSCME Council 18 and New Mexico Human Services Department

22-PELRB-2016, PELRB No. 108-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Chris Verduzco v. Luna County

23-PELRB-2016, PELRB CASE NO. 309-15

AFSCME Council 18 and New Mexico Human Services Department

24-PELRB-2016, PELRB CASE NO. 302-16

NEA-Clayton and Clayton Public Schools

25-PELRB-2016, PELRB CASE NO. 307-16

United Mine Workers of America and Socorro County

26-PELRB-2016, PELRB CASE NO. 108-16

AFSCME Council 18 and Chris Verduzco v. Luna County

27-PELRB-2016

Luna County

28-PELRB-2016

Open Meetings Act Resolution

1-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 311-13

CSEC-Las Cruces v. Las Cruces Public Schools

2-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 318-13

New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officers v. Cibola County

3-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 317-13

New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officers v. Cibola County

4-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 134-11

CWA Local 7076 v. New Mexico Public Education Department

5-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 301-14

AFSCME Council 18 v. Gila Regional Medical Center

6-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 319-13

Hatch Police Officer’s Association/FOP v. Village of Hatch

7-PELRB-2014, PELRB No’s. 313-13; 314-13; 315-13 and 316-13 consolidated

New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officers and AFSCME, Council 18 v. Santa Fe County

8-PELRB-2014, PELRB 303-14

AFSCME COUNCIL 18, NMCPSO and The Board Of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County

9-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 310-13

AFSCME COUNCIL 18 and Hidalgo County

10-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 110-13

AFSCME COUNCIL 18 v. Hidalgo County

11-PELRB-2014, PELRB Case No. 304-14

AFSCME COUNCIL 18 and Town of Taos

12-PELRB-2014, PELRB Case No. 305-14

AFSCME COUNCIL 18 and Grant County

13-PELRB-2014, PELRB 303-14

AFSCME COUNCIL 18 and NMCPSO and The Board Of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County

14-PELRB-2014, PELRB 303-14

AFSCME COUNCIL 18 and NMCPSO and The Board Of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County

15-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 304-14

AFSCME COUNCIL 18 and Town of Taos

16-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 305-14

AFSCME COUNCIL 18 and Grant County

17-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 306-14

Kuchan, AFSCME & Town of Edgewood

18-PELRB-2014, PELRB No. 306-14

Kuchan, AFSCME & Town of Edgewood

19-PELRB-2014

Open Meetings Resolution

1-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 144-09

AFSCME, Council 18 v. State of New Mexico

2-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 311-11

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 18, AFL-CIO v. New Mexico Corrections Department

3-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 118-11

Raton Firefighters Association, IAFF Local 2378 v. City of Raton

4-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 113-12

AFSCME, Council 18 v. New Mexico Regulation and Licensing Department

5-PELRB-2013, PELRB NO. 124-12

American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 18, AFL-CIO v. State of New Mexico Regulation and Licensing Department

6-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 303-13

AFSCME Council 18 v. Hidalgo County

7-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 303-13

AFSCME Council 18 v. Hidalgo County

8-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 313-12

NEA-Loving v. Loving Municipal School District

9-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 401-13

Amendment of Rules NMAC 11.21.2.8, Commencement of Case and NMAC 11.21.3.17, Briefs

10-PELRB-2013, PELRB 122-12

AFSCME, Council 18 v. New Mexico Childen, Youth and Families Department

11-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 200-13

Hidalgo County Ordinance No. 97-12

12-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 302-13

Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local 492 v. North Central Solid Waste Authority

13-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 304-13

McKinley County Federation of United School Employees and Gallup-McKinley County Schools

14-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 106-13

NEA-NM v. West Las Vegas School District and Gene Parsons

15-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 101-12

AFSCME Council 18 v. The State of New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department

16-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 116-12

AFSCME Council 18 v. New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department

17-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 305-13

Socorro Consolidated School District v. Socorro School Employees’ Association (SSEA), Local 3878

18-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 302-13

Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local 492 v. North Central Solid Waste Authority

19-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 302-11

Raton Firefighters Association, IAFF Local 2378 v. City of Raton

20-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 310-11

Teacher’s Association of Lordsburg v. Lordsburg Municipal School District

21-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 108-13

National Education Association – West Las Vegas (NEA-WLA) v. West Las Vegas School District

22-PELRB-2013, PELRB 107-13

National Education Association – Alamogordo v. Alamogordo Public Schools

23-PELRB-2013, PELRB Case No. 307-13

AFSCME Council 18, AFL-CIO v. City of Belen Police Department

24-PELRB-2013, PELRB Case No: 306-13

New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officers and Santa Fe County

25-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 301-13

Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local 492 v. Curry County Detention Center

26-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 304-13

McKinley County Federation of United School Employees and Gallup-McKinley County Schools

27-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 101-13

Central Consolidated School Association – CCEA v. Central Consolidated School District

28-PELRB-2013, PELRB No. 134-11

CWA Local 7076 v. New Mexico Public Education Department

29-PELRB-2013, PELRB Case No: 306-13

New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officers, AFSCME, Council 18 and Santa Fe County

30-PELRB-2013, PELRB Case No: 306-13

New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officers, AFSCME, Council 18 and Santa Fe County

31-PELRB-2013, PELRB 202-13

In re: Ruidoso Public Schools

1-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 315-10

NEA-NM v. Lake Arthur Municipal Schools

2-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 119-11

AFSCME, Council 18 v. City of Rio Rancho

3-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 142-11

Communications Workers of America v. State of NM Office of the State Engineer

4-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 127-10

Santa Fe Police Officer’s Association v. City of Santa Fe

5-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 123-09

AFSCME, Council 18 v. NM Department of Health

6-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 126-11

International Association of Firefighters, Local 244 v. City of Albuquerque and City of Albuquerque Fire Department

7-PELRB-2012, PELRB NO. 132-11

AFSCME, Council 18, AFL-CIO v. NM Human Services Department

8-PELRB-2012, PELRB NO.’s 139-11 and 311-11

AFSCME, Council 18, AFL-CIO v. NM Corrections Department

9-PELRB-2012, PELRB NO.’s 139-11 and 311-11

AFSCME, Council 18, AFL-CIO v. NM Corrections Department

10-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 303-11

NEA-NM and International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 953 v. Central Consolidated School District No. 22

11-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 308-11

McFadden v. CWA Local 7911

12-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 106-09

AFSCME Council 18 v. NM Corrections Department

13-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 128-10 (8)

IAFF Local 244 v. City of Albuquerque

14-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 126-11

International Association of Firefighter’s, Local 244 v. City of Albuquerque and City of Albuquerque Fire Department

15-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 133-11

Albuquerque Police Officers Association v. City of Albuquerque and City of Albuquerque Police Department

16-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 121-10

AFSCME 3022 v. City of Albuquerque

17-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 128-10 (A), 128-10 (C) and 128-10 (D)

IAFF Local 244 v. City of Albuquerque

18-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 103-11, 104-11, and 105-11

AFSCME Council 18, et al. v. City of Albuquerque

19-PELRB-2012, PELRB 106-11 and 108-11

AFSCME Council 18 and the Albuquerque Officer Association, Local 1888 v. City of Albuquerque

20-PELRB-2012, PELRB 107-11

AFSCME Council 18 v. City of Albuquerque

21-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 301-12

NEA-NM v. Silver Consolidated Schools

22-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 309-10

NEA-NM v. Monte del Sol Charter School

23-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 314-10

New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officers; Communications Workers of America, Local 7911 v. Town of Bernalillo

24-PELRB-2012, PELRB 315-11

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 18 v. Grant County Regional Dispatch Authority

25-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 145-09

CWA Local 7076 v. New Mexico Department of Health

26-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 151-11

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 18 v. New Mexico Human Services Department

27-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 152-11

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 18 v. City of Santa Fe

28-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 155-11

Scott Goold v. Ned Fuller

29-PELRB-2012, PELRB NO. 139-11

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, (AFSCME) Council 18, AFL-CIO v. Corrections Department

30-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 115-10

David Pennell v. New Mexico Department of Corrections

31-PELRB-2012, PELRB No.’s 146-11

State of New Mexico v. AFSCME Council 18

32-PELRB-2012, PELRB No.’s 154-11

AFSCME, Local 3022 v. Albuquerque and Bernalillo County Water Authority

33-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 144-09

AFSCME, Council 18 v. State of New Mexico

34-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 114-10

NEA – New Mexico v. Espanola Public Schools

35-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 147-11

AFSCME, Council 18 v. New Mexico Public Regulatory Commission

36-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 135-11

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 18, AFL-CIO, and the Bernalillo County Clerical White Collar, Local 2260 v. Bernalillo County

37-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 156-12

AFSCME, Council 18 and Local 2499 v. Bernalillo County

38-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 105-12

Richard C. Wright v. Bass Brothers Roofing, LLC

39-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 102-12

AFSCME, Council 18 and Local 2499 v. Bernalillo County

40-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 315-09

NEA – NM v. Alamogordo Municipal School District

41-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 311-10

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 18, AFL-CIO v. San Miguel County

42-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 101-12

AFSCME, Council 18 v. The State of New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department

43-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 313-11

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 18, AFL-CIO v. Bernalillo County

44-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 101-12

AFSCME, Council 18 v. The State of New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department

45-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 134-11

CWA Local 7076 v. New Mexico Public Education Department

46-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 134-11

State of New Mexico v. Communications Workers of America

47-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 145-11

State of New Mexico v. Communications Workers of America

48-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 145-11

State of New Mexico v. Communications Workers of America

49-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 304-12

New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officer Association v. County of Santa Fe

50-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 303-12

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 492 v. North Central Regional Transit District

51-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 302-12

AFT New Mexico v. Cibola County Board of Education

52-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 146-11

State of New Mexico v. AFSCME, Council 18

53-PELRB-2012, PELRB NO. 139-11

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, (AFSCME) Council 18, AFL-CIO v. New Mexico Corrections Department

54-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 103-12

Deborah Thuman v. New Mexico Public Defender Department

55-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 104-12

AFSCME, Council 18 v. New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department

56-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 108-12

AFSCME, Council 18 v. New Mexico Department of Health

57-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 137-09

New Mexico State Police Association v. New Mexico Department of Public Safety

58-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 301-11

City of Rio Rancho v. Rio Rancho Firefighter’s Association

59-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 151-11

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 18 v. New Mexico Human Services Department

60-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 311-11

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, (AFSCME) Council 18, AFL-CIO v. New Mexico Corrections Department

61-PELRB-2012, PELRB No.’s 123~11, 124-11, 125-11, 130-11, 136-11, and 138-11

Northern Federation of Education Employees v. Northern New Mexico Community College

62-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 106-12

AFSCME Council 18 v. State of New Mexico

63-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 109-12

AFSCME Council 18 v. New Mexico Department of Transportation

64-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 111-12

AFSCME Council 18 v. New Mexico Department of Transportation

65-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 114-12

AFSCME Council 18 v. New Mexico Department of Corrections

66-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 306-12

Fraternal Order of Police v. New Mexico Highlands University

67-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 307-12

AFSCME, Council 18, AFL-CIO v. San Miguel County

68-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 308-12

CSEC-Las Cruces v. Las Cruces Schools

69-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 309-12

AFSCME, Council 18, AFL-CIO v. New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department

70-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 304-12

New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officers Association v. County of Santa Fe

71-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 307-12

AFSCME, Council 18, AFL-CIO v. San Miguel County

72-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 309-12

AFSCME, Council 18, AFL-CIO v. New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department

73-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 310-12

AFSCME, Council 18, AFL-CIO v. County of Valencia

74-PELRB-2012, PELRB 311-12

Chauffeurs, Teamsters, and Helpers, Local 492 v. North Central Solid Waste Authority

75-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 113-12

AFSCME, Council 18 v. New Mexico Regulation and Licensing Department

76-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 134-11

CWA Local 7076 v. New Mexico Public Education Department

77-PELRB-2012, PELRB 311-12

Chauffeurs, Teamsters, and Helpers, Local 492 v. North Central Solid Waste Authority

78-PELRB-2012, PELRB No. 304-12

New Mexico Coalition of Public Safety Officers Association v. County of Santa Fe

1-PELRB-2011, Case No. 112-11

AFSCME, Council 18 v. NM Public Regulation Commission

2-PELRB-2011, Case No. 122-11

Dulce Federation of United School Employees Local 4519, AFT-NM, AFL-CIO v. Dulce Independent School District #21 and AFT-NM v. Dulce Independent School District #21

3-PELRB-2011, PELRB Case No. 120-11

Gonzales v. A.P.S.

4-PELRB-2011, PELRB No. 114-10

NEA-NM v. Española Public Schools

5-PELRB-2011, PELRB No. 310-11

Teacher’s Association of Lordsburg v. Lordsburg Municipal School District

6-PELRB-2011, PELRB No. 123-10, PELRB No. 117-10, PELRB No. 317-09

American Federation of Teachers of New Mexico v. NM CYFD

7-PELRB-2011, Case No. 309-11

AFSCME, Council 18 v. Valencia County Detention Department

8-PELRB-2011, PELRB No. 315-10

Lake Arthur-NEA v. Lake Arthur Municipal Schools

9-PELRB-2011, PELRB NO. 137-11

Mora Federation of School Employees v. Mora School District

10-PELRB-2011, PELRB No. 128-11

Santa Fe County Firefighters Association, IAFF Local 4366 v. County of Santa Fe

11-PELRB-2011, PELRB CASE NO. 147-11

AFSCME, Council 18 v. NM Public Regulation Commission

12-PELRB-2011, PELRB No. 303-11, PELRB No. 304-11

NEA-NM v. Central Consolidated School District No. 22

13-PELRB-2011, PELRB No. 144-11

New Mexico Motor Transportation Employee’s Association (MTD) and The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP)